If you already pay for the capability and nobody uses it, the problem is not capability. It is usability.
You sit through the demo and it is genuinely good. The tool reads incoming email, pulls out the order details, files them where they belong, and flags the ones that look wrong. By the end you are doing the math on hours saved. Then three weeks later, in a conversation about something else entirely, someone on your team mentions that the system you have paid for since 2021 does that. It is under a tab nobody opens.
The first reaction is usually embarrassment, followed closely by suspicion that the vendor was selling you something you already owned. Both are dead ends. Owning a feature and using a feature are nowhere near the same thing, and the space between them is where a lot of software money goes quietly missing. It is also why the tools that actually earn their keep tend to be a very short list.
So it is worth asking why the buried version stayed buried. The answer usually has nothing to do with what the software can do. It got switched on during an implementation nobody had time for, by a consultant who left in March. It needs a setup step that never got scheduled. It sits three clicks off the path the work actually runs on, so the person doing that work at four on a Thursday never sees it. Or it produces something perfectly correct that lands somewhere nobody checks. The capability was there the whole time. It was just never made usable where the work happens.
That changes what you are shopping for. You are not buying the ability to read email and pull order numbers out of it, because you already have that. You are buying a version of it that a specific person will open on a Tuesday when they are behind. Which means the demo should be tested differently. Ask to see it run on your messiest week, not the clean sample. Ask where the output lands and who has to remember to look at it. Ask what happens when it gets one wrong, because choosing between tools is mostly a question about the ugly cases.
If the new one is no easier to reach than the old one, it ends up in the same drawer with a bigger invoice attached. That is a design question more than a purchasing one. What technology should carry and what stays with a person gets decided by where the work actually happens, not by a feature list. So before the next demo, go look at what you already pay for. If you own something and nobody uses it, the useful question is not why you missed it. It is what stopped them.
Keep reading
Keep reading
About the author
Missy Ross
Missy Ross is the Founder and AI Architect of Vero Dawn, an AI architecture and solutions company that helps businesses see what could work better, determine the right solution, and bring it to life. Before founding Vero Dawn she spent 21 years in internal audit across banking and manufacturing, at Audit Director level.